David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 22 (4):595-602 (2004)
Distinctions between quantitative and qualitative social science misrepresent the actual choices confronting analysts of observations concerning social processes. Analysts regularly (if not always self-consciously) choose between adopting and avoiding formal representations of social processes. Despite widespread prejudices to the contrary, formalisms are available and helpful for all sorts of social scientific evidence, including those commonly labeled as qualitative. Available formalisms vary in two important regards: (1) from direct to analogical representation of the evidence at hand; and (2) from numerical to topological correspondence between formalism and evidence. Adoption of formalisms facilitates the identification of erroneous arguments, hence the correction of analytic errors and the production of more adequate explanations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Tilly (1997). Parliamentarization of Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Theory and Society 26 (2-3):245-273.
Dieter Rucht, Ruud Koopmans, Friedhelm Niedhardt, Mark R. Beissinger, Louis J. Crishock, Grzegorz Ekiert, Olivier Fillieule, Pierre Gentile, Peter Hocke, Jan Kubik, John D. McCarthy, Clark McPhail, Johan L. Olivier, Susan Olzak, David Schweingruber, Jackie Smith & Sidney Tarrow (1999). Acts of Dissent: New Developments in the Study of Protest. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Charles Tilly (2002). Event Catalogs as Theories. Sociological Theory 20 (2):248-254.
Roberto Franzosi & John W. Mohr (1997). New Directions in Formalization and Historical Analysis. Theory and Society 26 (2-3):133-160.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eric Dietrich & A. Markman (2003). Discrete Thoughts: Why Cognition Must Use Discrete Representations. Mind and Language 18 (1):95-119.
Gezinus Wolters & R. Hans Phaf (2002). Contrasts and Dissociations Suggest Qualitative Differences Between Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):359-360.
Eddy J. Davelaar (2011). Processes Versus Representations: Cognitive Control as Emergent, Yet Componential. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):247-252.
Herbert Simon (1995). Machine Discovery. Foundations of Science 1 (2):171-200.
Charles Tilly (2004). Reasons Why. Sociological Theory 22 (3):445-454.
Franz Huber, Formal Representations of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Zenonas Norkus (2007). Troubles with Mechanisms: Problems of the 'Mechanistic Turn' in Historical Sociology and Social History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):160-200.
Camille Roth, Dario Taraborelli & Nigel Gilbert (2011). Symposium on “Collective Representations of Quality”. Mind and Society 10 (2):165-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads165 ( #15,023 of 1,781,456 )
Recent downloads (6 months)118 ( #5,110 of 1,781,456 )
How can I increase my downloads?