Why the Triangle has Two Right A ngles Kath' Hauto
Phronesis 28 (1):1-16 (1983)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMihail Bota (2003). From Axis to Triangle: The Role of Orbital Cortex. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):552-553.
Armando Machado, Orlando Lourenço & Francisco J. Silva (2000). Facts, Concepts, and Theories: The Shape of Psychology's Epistemic Triangle. Behavior and Philosophy 28 (1/2):1 - 40.
Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Edward N. Zalta (2000). How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man. Noûs 34 (2):165–202.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette (1995). Environmental Risk and the Iron Triangle: The Case of Yucca Mountain. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):753-777.
Phillip John Meadows (2013). What Angles Can Tell Us About What Holes Are Not. Erkenntnis 78 (2):319-331.
S. Marc Cohen (1978). Essentialism in Aristotle. Review of Metaphysics 31 (3):387-405.
John Barresi & Chris Moore (2004). Even an “Epistemic Triangle” has Three Sides. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):98-99.
Alexander S. Kechris (1981). Forcing with \Triangle Perfect Trees and Minimal \Triangle-Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):803-816.
David Owen (2007). Locke on Judgment. In Lex Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke's "Essay Concerning Human Understanding". Cambridge University Press.
J. E. Tiles (1983). Why the Triangle has Two Right A Ngles Kath' Hauto. Phronesis 28 (1):1-16.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #277,406 of 556,920 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
