Response to “What Constitutes a Just Match?: A Reply to Murphy” by D. Micah Hester : Of Need, Justice, and Random Acts of Education [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):289-291 (2004)
D. Micah Hester thinks the residency match system helps sustain the divide between the haves and the have-nots in healthcare. He believes that the match system channels talent away from the have-nots in a more or less systematic way, damaging moral values in physicians as it goes. As a way of making inroads against these effects, he has asked whether assigning medical school graduates to residencies at random would distribute talent and educational opportunity more broadly and promote desirable moral values. I pointed out what I think are serious limitations of this proposal, and Hester has extended me the courtesy of a reply. Yet with that reply, I find that he has made it even more difficult to defend a lottery approach to residency assignment
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
D. Micah Hester (2003). What Constitutes a Just Match?: A Reply to Murphy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (1):78-82.
Timothy F. Murphy (2003). Justice in Residency Placement: Is the Match System an Offense to the Values of Medicine? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (1):66-77.
Carson Strong (2002). Response to ???May a Woman Clone Herself???? By Jean E. Chambers (CQ Vol 10, No 2) and ???Entitlement to Cloning??? By Timothy F. Murphy (CQ Vol 8, No 3). [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):76-82.
Gary Winship (2011). Chess & Schizophrenia: Murphy V Mr Endon, Beckett V Bion. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (4):339-351.
Jean E. Chambers (2001). Response to “Entitlement to Cloning” by Timothy Murphy (CQ Vol 8, No 3) and “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong (CQ Vol 7, No 3) May a Woman Clone Herself? [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2):194-204.
Timothy F. Murphy (1999). Response to “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):364-368.
T. F. Murphy (1986). Acts and Omissions Doctrine and Abortion: Reply to Dr. Toon. Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (1):53-54.
Jean E. Chambers (2002). Response to “Clone Alone” by Carson Strong and “Are There Limits to the Use of Reproductive Cloning” by Timothy Murphy. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (2):169-179.
D. Micah Hester (2007). The Great Debates. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):456.
Micah Hester (2007). Guest Editorial. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):254-256.
D. Micah Hester (2001). The Anatomy of Bioethical Consultations. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):57-58.
D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld (2009). Pardon My Asking: What's New? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):11-13.
D. Micah Hester (1998). The Place of Community in Medical Encounters. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (4):369 – 383.
D. Micah Hester (2009). Adolescent Decisionmaking, Part II. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):432.
D. Micah Hester & Karen Kovach (2004). Trumping Professionalism. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):51-52.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads3 ( #620,570 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?