The Invisibility of Evil: Moral Progress and the 'Animal Holocaust'

Philosophical Papers 32 (2):109-131 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of an ?animal holocaust? by way of J.M. Coetzee's The Lives of Animals, and asks whether the Nazi treatment of the Jews can be legitimately compared to modern factory farming. While certain parallels make the comparison appealing, it is argued, only the holocaust can be described as ?evil.? The phenomena share another feature, however, namely, the capacity of perpetrators to render victims ?invisible.? This leaves the moral dimension of the comparison in tact since it shows defenders and critics of an ?animal holocaust? to be talking about different things: the comparison is offensive for many because it levels degrees of moral value attributed to human and animal life, respectively, while for others it articulates the challenge of bringing non-human sentient beings into the same moral universe as their human counterparts. The paper concludes by asking whether such moral progress can ever render the death of human beings and animals similar in kind

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can the treatment of animals be compared to the holocaust?David Sztybel - 2006 - Ethics and the Environment 11 (1):97-132.
Without a tear: our tragic relationship with animals.Mark H. Bernstein - 2004 - Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
On justifying the exploitation of animals in research.S. F. Sapontzis - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):177-196.
“Our fellow creatures”.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):353 - 380.
Attitudes to animals: views in animal welfare.Francine L. Dolins (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Popular media and animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal rights: a very short introduction.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal rights: a philosophical defence.Mark Rowlands (ed.) - 1998 - New York: St. Martin's Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
64 (#227,430)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Costelloe
College of William and Mary

Citations of this work

The epistemology of meat eating.C. E. Abbate - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (1):67-84.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references