David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):63-81 (2008)
It is controversial whether Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics is of critical importance for mathematical proofs, or is only concerned with the adequate philosophical interpretation of mathematics. Wittgenstein's remarks on the infinity of prime numbers provide a helpful example which will be used to clarify this question. His antiplatonistic view of mathematics contradicts the widespread understanding of proofs as logical derivations from a set of axioms or assumptions. Wittgenstein's critique of traditional proofs of the infinity of prime numbers, specifically those of Euler and Euclid, not only offers philosophical insight but also suggests substantive improvements. A careful examination of his comments leads to a deeper understanding of what proves the infinity of primes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daesuk Han (2011). Wittgenstein and the Real Numbers. History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (3):219-245.
Similar books and articles
Anthony Birch (2007). Waismann's Critique of Wittgenstein. Analysis and Metaphysics 6 (2007):263-272.
Michael Heller (2011). Part IV. Perspectives on Infinity From Physics and Cosmology : 7. Some Considerations on Infinity in Physics / Carlo Rovelli ; 8. Cosmological Intimations of Infinity / Anthony Aguirre ; 9. Infinity and the Nostalgia of the Stars/ Marco Bersanelli ; 10. Infinities in Cosmology. [REVIEW] In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Achtner (2011). Part I. Perspectives on Infinity From History : 1. Infinity as a Transformative Concept in Science and Theology. In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Crispin Wright (ed.) (2001). Rails to Infinity. Harvard University Press.
Hong LI & Donghui HAN (2007). What is "the Ineffable" Exactly? An Extensive Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402 - 411.
Edward Nelson (2011). Part II. Perspectives on Infinity From Mathematics : 2. The Mathematical Infinity / Enrico Bombieri ; 3. Warning Signs of a Possible Collapse of Contemporary Mathematics. [REVIEW] In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
C. J. G. Wright (2001). Rails to Infinity: Essays on Themes From Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. Harvard University Press.
Denys A. Turner (2011). A Partially Skeptical Response to Hart and Russell. [REVIEW] In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Alexandra Shlapentokh (2002). On Diophantine Definability and Decidability in Some Rings of Algebraic Functions of Characteristic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):759-786.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads33 ( #51,655 of 1,098,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #33,712 of 1,098,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?