Acts of Arguing, A Rhetorical Model of Argument (ARNO R. LODDER)

Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2001

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Christopher W. Tindale, acts of arguing, a rhetorical model of argument.Arno R. Lodder - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
Tindale's Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument.J. Anthony Blair - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (2).
Christopher W. Tindale, Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument Reviewed by. [REVIEW]David Godden - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (5):384-386.
Tindale, Christopher W. (2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. [REVIEW]Charles Arthur Willard - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (4):505-506.
Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument Christopher W. Tindale SUNY Series in Logic and Language Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1999, xii + 245 pp., $18.95 paper. [REVIEW]Jim Gough - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (2):401-.
Law, logic, rhetoric: A procedural model of legal argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 569--588.
Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Thomas F. Gordon, the pleadings game – an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice.Arno R. Lodder - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):255-264.
Preface.Arno R. Lodder & John Zeleznikow - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):189-192.
Thomas F. Gordon, The Pleadings Game – An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. [REVIEW]Arno R. Lodder - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):255-264.
DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 1999 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Feminist Epistemologies of Situated Knowledges: Implications for Rhetorical Argumentation.James C. Lang - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):309-334.
Arno R. lodder, dialaw: On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation. Law and philosophy library vol. 42. [REVIEW]Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):265-276.
The Rhetorical Theory of Argument is Self-Defeating.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 3 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
1 (#1,886,728)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Tindale
University of Windsor

Citations of this work

View all 103 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references