Evaluating palliative care: Facilitating reflexive dialgoues about an ambiguous concept [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):261-276 (2001)
Palliation is a relatively new concept that is used in connection with the integral care provided to those who are unable to recover from their illness. The specific meaning of the concept has not been clearly defined. This article explores the possibilities offered by a responsive approach to evaluation that can facilitate a reflexive dialogue on this ambiguous concept. In doing so it draws on a case study of a palliative care project in a Dutch health care authority. The article begins with an overview of the characteristics of a responsive approach to evaluation and addresses interpretative, representational and practical dilemmas. It goes on to present a series of dialogues between health professionals, informal caregivers, patients and evaluators. These dialogues take the form of juxtaposed stories, transcribed conversations and interpretations. Finally, the learning experiences are summarised and the appropriateness of the responsive approach to evaluate palliative care is discussed
|Keywords||responsive evaluation palliative care dialogue narrative empirical ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
H. Colby William, John Lantos Constance Dahlin & Myra Christopher John Carney (forthcoming). The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Domain 8: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care. HEC Forum.
William Colby, Constance Dahlin, John Lantos, John Carney & Myra Christopher (2010). The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Domain 8: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 22 (2):117-131.
T. W. Kirk (2011). The Meaning, Limitations and Possibilities of Making Palliative Care a Public Health Priority by Declaring It a Human Right. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):84-92.
Maaike A. Hermsen & Henk A. M. J. ten Have (2003). Moral Problems in Palliative Care Practice: A Qualitative Study. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):263-272.
Joachim Widder & Monika Glawischnig-Goschnik (2002). The Concept of Disease in Palliative Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):191-197.
Fiona Randall (2006). The Philosophy of Palliative Care: Critique and Reconstruction. Oxford University Press.
Fiona Randall (1996). Palliative Care Ethics: A Good Companion. Oxford University Press.
H. ten Have & David Clark (eds.) (2002). The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives. Open University Press.
Y. Tony Yang & Margaret M. Mahon (2012). Palliative Care for the Terminally Ill in America: The Consideration of QALYs, Costs, and Ethical Issues. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):411-416.
Bert Gordijn & Rien Janssens (2004). Euthanasia and Palliative Care in the Netherlands: An Analysis of the Latest Developments. Health Care Analysis 12 (3):195-207.
Craig Blinderman (2009). Palliative Care, Public Health and Justice: Setting Priorities in Resource Poor Countries. Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):105-110.
Wim Dekkers (2009). On the Notion of Home and the Goals of Palliative Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (5):335-349.
Laura Hawryluck, William Harvey, Louise Lemieux-Charles & Peter Singer (2002). Consensus Guidelines on Analgesia and Sedation in Dying Intensive Care Unit Patients. BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-9.
Erik Gustavsson (2013). From Needs to Health Care Needs. Health Care Analysis (1):1-14.
Eve Garrard & Anthony Wrigley (2009). Hope and Terminal Illness: False Hope Versus Absolute Hope. Clinical Ethics 4 (1):38-43.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads4 ( #195,632 of 1,008,724 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?