David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2007)
Fallacies and Argument Appraisal presents an introduction to the nature, identification, and causes of fallacious reasoning, along with key questions for evaluation. Drawing from the latest work on fallacies as well as some of the standard ideas that have remained relevant since Aristotle, Christopher Tindale investigates central cases of major fallacies in order to understand what has gone wrong and how this has occurred. Dispensing with the approach that simply assigns labels and brief descriptions of fallacies, Tindale provides fuller treatments that recognize the dialectical and rhetorical contexts in which fallacies arise. This volume analyzes major fallacies through accessible, everyday examples. Critical questions are developed for each fallacy to help the student identify them and provided considered evaluations.
|Keywords||Fallacies (Logic Reasoning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$13.78 used (61% off) $26.65 new (24% off) $28.85 direct from Amazon (18% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BC175.T56 2007|
|ISBN(s)||0521603064 0521842085 9780521603065 9780521842082 9781139461849 1139461842|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci (2015). The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life. Argumentation 2015:10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.
Scott Aikin & John Casey (2011). Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men. Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Taeda Tomić (2013). False Dilemma: A Systematic Exposition. Argumentation 27 (4):1-22.
Scott F. Aikin & John P. Casey (forthcoming). Straw Men, Iron Men, and Argumentative Virtue. Topoi:1-10.
Douglas Walton (2014). Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek. Argumentation 28 (3):317-324.
Similar books and articles
Herman E. Stark (2000). Fallacies and Logical Errors. Inquiry 20 (1):23-32.
Bradley Dowden, Fallacies. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Douglas N. Walton (1987). Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. J. Benjamins Pub. Co..
Niki Pfeifer (2008). A Probability Logical Interpretation of Fallacies. In G. Kreuzbauer, N. Gratzl & E. Hiebl (eds.), Rhetorische Wissenschaft: Rede Und Argumentation in Theorie Und Praxis. Lit 225--244.
David Botting (2012). Fallacies of Accident. Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
David Botting (2012). What is a Sophistical Refutation? Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Douglas Walton (2011). Defeasible Reasoning and Informal Fallacies. Synthese 179 (3):377 - 407.
Jonathan E. Adler (2000). Three Fallacies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #51,046 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #134,315 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?