Graduate studies at Western
Zygon 45 (2):448-461 (2010)
|Abstract||Philip Hefner identifies three settings in which to assess the future of science and religion: the academy, the public sphere, and the faith community. This essay argues that the discourse of science and religion could improve its standing within the secular academy in America by shifting the focus from theology to history. In the public sphere, the science-and-religion discourse could play an important role of promoting tolerance and respect toward the religious Other. For a given faith community (for example, Judaism) the discourse of science and religion can ensure future intellectual depth by virtue of study and ongoing interpretation. The essay challenges the suggestion to adopt irony as a desirable posture for science-and-religion discourse.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Louis Caruana (2009). The Force of Counter-Evidence in Science and Religion. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):361-374.
Ann Pederson (2010). New Directions, New Collaborations. Zygon 45 (2):499-505.
Edmund F. Byrne (2010). Why and How Secular Society Should Accommodate Religion: A Philosophical Proposal. Edwin Mellen Press.
Taner Edis (2006). Science and Nonbelief. Greenwood Press.
Bjørn Grinde (2011). God in the Hands of Future Science. World Futures 66 (5):351-362.
Hava Tirosh-Samuelson (2005). Rethinking the Past and Anticipating the Future of Religion and Science. Zygon 40 (1):33-41.
Philip Hefner (2010). Embodied Science: Recentering Religion-and-Science. Zygon 45 (1):251-263.
Eric R. Dorman (2011). Hinduism and Science: The State of the South Asian Science and Religion Discourse. Zygon 46 (3):593-619.
Added to index2010-05-27
Total downloads5 ( #170,343 of 738,450 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?