David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 18 (1):60-83 (2000)
Parsons's training as an economist, his graduate stay at Heidelberg, and his participation in the Henderson seminar at Harvard provide major clues to his familiarity with Marshall, Pareto, and Weber-three of the four figures whose convergence forms the major theoretical achievement in The Structure of Social Action. But what led him to Durkheim, since Parsons did not study or reside in France, yet read Durkheim in the original, remains an enigma. Without resolving the enigma, this paper argues that Parsons had a great deal in common with Durkheim, and, equally important, that in his mature and late periods he found in his "revisits" of the later writings of Durkheim both inspiration and affinity. I argue that Parsons well deserves recognition as a major authority on Durkheim, and that both combined offer an alternative to the contemporary version of utilitarianism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James J. Valone (1980). Parsons' Contributions to Sociological Theory: Reflections on the Schutz-Parsons Correspondence. Human Studies 3 (1):375 - 386.
Richard A. Hilbert (1995). Garfinkel's Recovery of Themes in Classical Sociology. Human Studies 18 (2-3):157 - 175.
Toshi W. Parsons (2003). James D. Parsons, 1918-2001. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76 (5):165 - 166.
Emile Durkheim (1986). Durkheim on Politics and the State. Stanford University Press.
Hans Joas (1988). The Antinomies of Neofunctionalism: A Critical Essay on Jeffrey Alexander. Inquiry 31 (4):471 – 494.
William J. Rapaport (1985). To Be and Not to Be. Noûs 19 (2):255-271.
Felix Mühlhölzer (2010). Mathematical Intuition and Natural Numbers: A Critical Discussion. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 73 (2):265–292.
R. Keith Sawyer (2002). Durkheim's Dilemma: Toward a Sociology of Emergence. Sociological Theory 20 (2):227-247.
Dean R. Gerstein (1983). Durkheim's Paradigm: Reconstructing a Social Theory. Sociological Theory 1:234-258.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #338,004 of 1,789,721 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #313,929 of 1,789,721 )
How can I increase my downloads?