David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):269-282 (2008)
Mengzi believed that tyrannical rulers can be justifiably deposed, and many contemporary scholars see this as grounding a right of popular rebellion. I argue that the text of the Mengzi reveals a more mixed view, and does so in two respects. First, it suggests that the people are sometimes permitted to participate in a rebellion but not permitted to decide for themselves when rebellion is warranted. Second, it gives appropriate moral weight not to the people’s judgments about the justifiability of rebelling, but rather to certain affections and behaviors that closely track their life satisfaction. I contend that in both respects the permissions Mengzi grants the people fall short of a proper right of rebellion. I conclude that the more historical account of Mengzi’s “just revolt theory” suggests an intriguing division of deliberative labor, and note some of the advantages of this account.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel A. Bell (2006). Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton University Press.
Wm Theodore de Bary (1982). Introduction. In Hok-lam Chan & William Theodore De Bary (eds.), Yüan Thought: Chinese Thought and Religion Under the Mongols. Columbia University Press.
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Seung-Hwan Lee (1992). Was There a Concept of Rights in Confucian Virtue-Based Morality? Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19 (3):241-261.
Citations of this work BETA
Sungmoon Kim (2013). Between Good and Evil: Xunzi's Reinterpretation of the Hegemonic Rule as Decent Governance. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (1):73-92.
Similar books and articles
Xinyan Jiang (2005). Why Was Mengzi Not a Vegetarianist? Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (1):59–73.
Manyul Im (2004). Moral Knowledge and Self Control in Mengzi: Rectitude, Courage, and Qi. Asian Philosophy 14 (1):59 – 77.
Franklin Perkins (2005). Following Nature with Mengzi or Zhuangzi. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):327-340.
Susan Blake (2010). Mengzi and its Philosophical Commitments: Comments on Van Norden's Mengzi. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (4):668-675.
Günter Wohlfart (2010). Kantianism Versus Confucianism: From Kant's Universalized Egocentrism to Kongzi's Moral Reciprocity and Mengzi's Compassion. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):105-116.
David Elstein (2010). Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):427-443.
E. G. Hardy (1909). Henderson's Civil War and Rebellion Civil War and Rebellion in the Roman Empire. A Companion to the Histories of Tacitus. By Bernard W. Henderson, M.A., Sub-Rector and Tutor of Exeter College, Oxford. London: Macmillan & Co. 1908. 8vo. Pp. Xxiii + 360. Four Illustrations From Busts, Maps and Plans. [REVIEW] Classical Quarterly 3 (02):137-.
P. J. Ivanhoe (2004). Interpreting the Mengzi. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 54 (2):249 - 263.
Emily McRae (2011). The Cultivation of Moral Feelings and Mengzi's Method of Extension. Philosophy East and West 61 (4):587-608.
Steven F. Geisz (2008). Mengzi, Strategic Language, and the Shaping of Behavior. Philosophy East and West 58 (2):190-222.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #40,896 of 1,410,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,782 of 1,410,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?