The Semiology of the Theater: Twenty-Three Centuries or Twenty-Two Years?
Diogenes 38 (149):84-104 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCarol C. Gould (1994). Feminist Philosophy After Twenty Years Between Discrimination and Differentiation: Introductory Reflections. Hypatia 9 (3):183 - 187.
Dominic Mciver Lopes (2007). Shikinen Sengu and the Ontology of Architecture in Japan. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (1):77–84.
Giovanni Sambin & Jan M. Smith (eds.) (1998). Twenty-Five Years of Constructive Type Theory: Proceedings of a Congress Held in Venice, October 1995. Oxford University Press.
T. Kowzan (1968). The Sign in the Theater: An Introduction To the Semiology of the Art of the Spectacle. Diogenes 16 (61):52-80.
Charles Hartshorne (1998). Twenty Opinions From Five Times Twenty Years. The Personalist Forum 14 (2):75-76.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads8 ( #124,608 of 556,909 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,909 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
