Applied Ethics. A Defence

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):397-406 (2011)
Given a reasonable coherentist view of justification in ethics, applied ethics, as here conceived of, cannot only guide us, in our practical decisions, but also provide moral understanding through explanation of our moral obligations. Furthermore, applied ethics can contribute to the growth of knowledge in ethics as such. We put moral hypotheses to crucial test in individual cases. This claim is defended against the challenges from moral intuitionism and particularism
Keywords Considered intuitions  Cognitive psychotherapy  Intuitionism  Particularism  Theory in ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9293-8
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
T. Chappell (1998). Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Hugh Upton (2011). Moral Theory and Theorizing in Health Care Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):431-443.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Guy Axtell & Philip Olson (2012). Recent Work in Applied Virtue Ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):183-204.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

205 ( #8,552 of 1,725,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

126 ( #5,647 of 1,725,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.