Social Psychology and the Paradox of Revolution

Abstract According to the gunman theory, many revolutions do not take place, in spite of the fact that the majority stands to gain if they can put an end to the oppression exercised over it, since a gunman can see to it that egoistic individuals have no incentive to take part in revolution. Champions of the idea that there is a paradox of revolution go further: Even if individuals care about the common good, they will not take action. This is wrong. If they care about the common good, revolution will take place. This is good news. The bad news is, however, that those conditions we find in social psychological literature, which are helpful to the revolutionary cause, tend to be undermined by the oppressive system when it is well-functioning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

    Similar books and articles
    Torbjörn Tännsjö (2006). Rational Injustice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):423-439.
    David G. Rowley (1996). Bogdanov and Lenin: Epistemology and Revolution. Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):1 - 19.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-02

    Total downloads

    6 ( #145,615 of 549,074 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,317 of 549,074 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums