A communitarian theory of press freedom
| Abstract | (Uncorrected OCR) Abstract The thesis is to provide a communitarian theory of freedom of the press as an alternative to two schools of thoughts informed by major political theories, namely liberalism and authoritarianism. Before articulating the communitarian theory, the thesis will first review and critique both liberal arguments for press freedom and authoritarian considerations against it. While it is argued that liberal arguments from individual authority and truth-discovery to democracy have inherent difficulties in cultivating the press that could serve the community well, the potential dangers resulting from authoritarian theory and practices of the press will also be discussed. For authoritarianism, the arguments of Singapore officials will be chosen for a case study, not only because their arguments are articulate but also because they profess themselves to be communitarian, who are authoritarian in disguise. After two major theories of press freedom are reviewed, the thesis will present the communitarian view of the press by first revisiting traditional justifications of freedom of the press. It is to reinterpret the meanings of freedom of the press in the light of communitarian values and analysis. Informed by communitarian thinking, it will be argued, the press could play an active role in promoting deliberative dialogue, civic participation and community building. (204 words). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesDaniel A. Bell (1997). A Communitarian Critique of Authoritarianism: The Case of Singapore. Political Theory 25 (1):6-32.
David E. Guinn (2002). Faith on Trial: Communities of Faith, The First Amendment and the Theory of Deep Diversity. Lexington Books.
Louis W. Hodges (1996). Ruminations About the Communitarian Debate. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (3):133 – 139.
Peter Lindsay (2002). The 'Disembodied Self' in Political Theory: The Communitarians, Macpherson and Marx. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2):191-211.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (1999). Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197 – 212.
Elizabeth Dickson (2012). A Communitarian Theory of the Education Rights of Students with Disabilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (10):1093-1109.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (1999). Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197-212.
Janusz Grygienc (2012). Between Individual and Community. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):63-89.
Zygmunt Bauman (1995). Communitarianism, Freedom, and the Nation‐State. Critical Review 9 (4):539-553.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-23Total downloads10 ( #106,476 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
