Why Did Weyl Think that Dedekind’s Norm of Belief in Mathematics is Perverse?

In William Demopoulos (ed.), The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 445-451 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that Weyl's criticism of Dedekind’s principle that "In science, what is provable ought not to be believed without proof." challenges not only a logicist norm of belief in mathematics, but also a realist view about whether there is a fact of the matter as to what norms of belief are correct.

Similar books and articles

The truth Norm of belief.Conor Mchugh - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):8-30.
Weyl criticism of dedekind.U. Majer - 1992 - Dialectica 46 (2):141-149.
Knowledge Norms.Matthew A. Benton - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:nn-nn.
The Norm of Belief.John Gibbons - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A constructive proof of the Peter‐Weyl theorem.Thierry Coquand & Bas Spitters - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (4):351-359.
Hermann Weyl's Mathematics, Science and Phenomenology.Richard A. Feist - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-27

Downloads
129 (#136,639)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references