David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):497-520 (2009)
visual masking provides a clear illustration that ‘there is really only a verbal difference’ between two versions of the Cartesian Theater model of the mind. This alleged lack of a distinction is both the crucial premise of their main argument against the Cartesian Theater and a motivator for accepting their own Multiple Drafts model. I argue that metacontrast reveals a difference between the two versions of the Cartesian Theater that meets criteria found in (Dennett and Kinsbourne ) for determining such a difference. This difference undermines the soundness of their argument against the Cartesian Theater, and exerts pressure on Dennett and Kinsbourne to offer a more detailed articulation of their model. Introduction Brief Explanation of Metacontrast Backward Visual Masking The Stalinesque and Orwellian Models of Metacontrast 3.1 Criteria for determining a difference A Difference That Makes a Difference 4.1 Skeptical hypothesis objection Other Objections and Replies 5.1 Straw person objection 5.2 Corroborative issues objection Conclusion CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||Dennett masking metacontrast consciousness Stalinesque / Orwellian Cartesian Theater|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ned Block (1995). On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Haluk Ogmen & Jian Chen (2004). Unconscious Priming by Color and Form: Different Processes and Levels. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):138-157.
Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Tony Ro & Neel S. Singhal (2004). Unconscious Color Priming Occurs at Stimulus- Not Percept-Dependent Levels of Processing. Psychological Science 15 (3):198-202.
Daniel Dennett (1993). Caveat Emptor (Reply to Essays on Consciousness Explained - Reply to Mangan, Toribio, Baars and Mcgovern) In. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (1):48-57.
Daniel C. Dennett (1993). Caveat Emptor. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (12-13):48-57.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ronald A. Lindsay (2002). The Need to Specify the Difference "Difference" Makes. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30 (1):34-37.
Alison Wylie (2006). Introduction: When Difference Makes a Difference. Episteme 3 (1-2):1-7.
Peter Menzies (2004). Difference-Making in Context. In J. Collins, N. Hall & L. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. Mit Press.
David Hunter (2009). Beliefs and Dispositions. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:243-262.
A. Baker (2003). Does the Existence of Mathematical Objects Make a Difference? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):246 – 264.
Seahwa Kim (2009). Counterlegals and the 'Makes No Difference' Argument. Erkenntnis 70 (3):419 - 426.
John Barresi & John R. Christie (2002). Using Illusory Line Motion to Differentiate Misrepresentation (Stalinesque) and Misremembering (Orwellian) Accounts of Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):347-365.
S. J. Todd (2006). Unmasking Multiple Drafts. Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):477-494.
Added to index2009-08-12
Total downloads41 ( #58,316 of 1,696,464 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #69,748 of 1,696,464 )
How can I increase my downloads?