Unmasking the truth beneath the beauty: Why the supposed aesthetic judgements made in science may not be aesthetic at all
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):61 – 79 (2008)
In this article I examine the status of putative aesthetic judgements in science and mathematics. I argue that if the judgements at issue are taken to be genuinely aesthetic they can be divided into two types, positing either a disjunction or connection between aesthetic and epistemic criteria in theory/proof assessment. I show that both types of claim face serious difficulties in explaining the purported role of aesthetic judgements in these areas. I claim that the best current explanation of this role, McAllister's 'aesthetic induction' model, fails to demonstrate that the judgements at issue are genuinely aesthetic. I argue that, in light of these considerations, there are strong reasons for suspecting that many, and perhaps all, of the supposedly aesthetic claims are not genuinely aesthetic but are in fact 'masked' epistemic assessments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Lipton (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
James W. McAllister (1996). Beauty & Revolution in Science. Cornell University Press.
G. H. Hardy (1992). A Mathematician's Apology. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Noël Carroll (2000). Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research. Ethics 110 (2):350-387.
Frank Sibley (2001). Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Carlo Cellucci (2015). Mathematical Beauty, Understanding, and Discovery. Foundations of Science 20 (4):339-355.
Similar books and articles
Malcolm Budd (1999). Aesthetic Judgements, Aesthetic Principles and Aesthetic Properties. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):295–311.
Caj Strandberg (2011). A Structural Disanalogy Between Aesthetic and Ethical Value Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):51-67.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2006). Towards a Reasonable Objectivism for Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):163-177.
Nick Zangwill (1998). The Concept of the Aesthetic. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):78–93.
Malcolm Budd (2008). Aesthetic Essays. Oxford University Press.
B. R. Tilghman (2004). Reflections on Aesthetic Judgement. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):248-260.
Malcolm Budd (2007). The Intersubjective Validity of Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):333-371.
Stephen Davies (2006). Aesthetic Judgements, Artworks and Functional Beauty. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):224-241.
Tomáš Kulka (2009). Why Aesthetic Value Judgements Cannot Be Justified. Estetika 46 (1):3-28.
James O. Young (2009). Relativism, Standards and Aesthetic Judgements. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):221 – 231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #80,232 of 1,725,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,725,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?