What's Wrong with the Aristotelian Theory of Sensible Qualities?
Phronesis 42 (3):263-282 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Puryear (2013). Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):319-346.
Robert Schroer (2002). Matching Sensible Qualities: A Skeleton in the Closet for Representationalism. Philosophical Studies 107 (3):259-73.
Robert Pasnau (2006). A Theory of Secondary Qualities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):568–591.
Shane Duarte (2009). Ideas and Confusion in Leibniz. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):705-733.
Alex Byrne (forthcoming). Sensory Qualities, Sensible Qualities, Sensational Qualities. In Beckermann, McLaughlin & Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Todd Ganson (1999). Democritus Against Reducing Sensible Qualities. Ancient Philosophy 19 (2):201-215.
G. F. Stout (1903). Primary and Secondary Qualities. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 4:141-160.
Robert Pasnau (2006). A Theory of Secondary Qualities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):568-591.
T. S. (1997). What's Wrong with the Aristotelian Theory of Sensible Qualities? Phronesis 42 (3):263-282.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads17 ( #71,062 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
