David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 22 (3):331-350 (2010)
According to a widely held view, people's commitments to laws are dependent on the existence in their community of a conventional practice of complying with certain fundamental laws. This conventionalism has significantly hampered our attempts to explain the normative practice of law. Ronald Dworkin has argued against conventionalism by bringing up the phenomenon of persistent fundamental legal controversies, but neither Dworkin nor his legal positivist respondents have correctly understood the real significance of such controversies. This article argues that such controversies pose a deep challenge to any conception of our legal practice as a genuinely normative, rule-mediated, practice. The article also argues that what is needed to deflect this challenge is a new understanding – different from the widely held conventionalist understanding – of how people's commitments to laws are predicated on their fellows’ like commitments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Raz (1975). Practical Reason and Norms. Hutchinson.
Peter Railton (1984). Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Paul Guyer (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin Toh (2014). Four Neglected Prescriptions of Hartian Legal Philosophy. Law and Philosophy 33 (6):689-724.
Kevin Toh (2015). Erratum To: Four Neglected Prescriptions of Hartian Legal Philosophy. Law and Philosophy 34 (3):333-368.
Similar books and articles
T. O. H. Kevin (2010). The Predication Thesis and a New Problem About Persistent Fundamental Legal Controversies. Utilitas 22 (3):331-350.
Marcelo Dascal (2001). Controversies and Epistemology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:159-192.
Dimitrios Kyritsis (2012). The Persistent Significance of Jurisdiction. Ratio Juris 25 (3):343-367.
Robert Heinaman (1981). Self-Predication in the "Sophist". Phronesis 26 (1):55 - 66.
Stephen Galoob (2012). How Do Roles Generate Reasons? A Method of Legal Ethics. Legal Ethics 15 (1):1-28.
Kevin Toh (2008). An Argument Against the Social Fact Thesis (and Some Additional Preliminary Steps Towards a New Conception of Legal Positivism). Law and Philosophy 27 (5):445 - 504.
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
I. Shani (2011). Review of Radu J. Bogdan's Predicative Minds: The Social Ontogeny of Propositional Thinking. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):596-605.
Arend Soeteman (2003). Legal Logic? Or Can We Do Without? Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):197-210.
David Martinez-Zorrilla (2011). The Structure of Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights. Law and Philosophy 30 (6):729-749.
Joseph Margolis (2007). Historicity and the Politics of Predication. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):79-100.
James W. Cornman (1962). Intentionality and Intensionality. Philosophical Quarterly 12 (January):44-52.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads56 ( #80,057 of 1,934,535 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,535 )
How can I increase my downloads?