David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 54 (3):226-251 (2011)
Abstract I argue against the two most influential readings of Frege's methodology in the philosophy of logic. Dummett's ?semanticist? reading sees Frege as taking notions associated with semantical content?and in particular, the semantical notion of truth?as primitive and as intelligible independently of their connection to the activity of judgment, inference, and assertion. Against this, the ?pragmaticist? reading proposed by Brandom and Ricketts sees Frege as beginning instead from the independent and intuitive grasp that we allegedly have on the latter activity and only then moving on to explain semantical notions in terms of the nature of such acts. Against both readings, I argue, first, that Frege gives clear indication that he takes semantical and pragmatical notions to be equally primitive, such that he would reject the idea that either sort of notion could function as the base for a non-circular explanation of the other. I argue, secondly, that Frege's own method for conveying the significance of these primitive notions?an activity that Frege calls ?elucidation??is, in fact, explicitly circular in nature. Because of this, I conclude that Frege should be read instead as conceiving of our grasp of the semantical and pragmatical dimensions of logic as far more of a holistic enterprise than either reading suggests
|Keywords||Frege philosophy of logic Dummett Ricketts|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Heck (2007). Frege and Semantics. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):27-63.
Howard Wettstein (1990). Frege‐Russell Semantics? Dialectica 44 (1‐2):113-135.
Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1986). On Frege's Two Notions of Sense. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):31-41.
Gregory Currie (1983). I. Interpreting Frege: A Reply to Michael Dummett. Inquiry 26 (3):345 – 359.
Wolfgang Künne (1997). Propositions in Bolzano and Frege. Grazer Philosophische Studien 53:203-240.
Ari Maunu (2002). Frege's Gedanken Are Not Truth Conditions. Facta Philosophica 4 (2):231-238.
Michael Dummett (1982). Objectivity and Reality in Lotze and Frege. Inquiry 25 (1):95 – 114.
James Levine (2002). Analysis and Decomposition in Frege and Russell. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):195-216.
Ivan Welty (2011). Frege on Indirect Proof. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):283-290.
Jan Wolenński (1997). Hans Sluga (Ed.), The Philosophy of Frege. A Four-Volume Collection of Scholarly Articles on All Aspects of Frege's Philosophy, Vol.1: General Assessments and Historical Accounts of Frege's Philosophy, Vol.2: Logic and Foundations of Mathematics in Frege's Philosophy, Vol.3: Meaning and Ontology in Frege's Philosophy, Vol.4: Sense and Reference in Frege's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 46 (3):407-410.
Verena Mayer (2007). Evidence, Judgment and Truth. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):175-197.
Joan Weiner (2005). Semantic Descent. Mind 114 (454):321-354.
Jan Dejnožka (2010). Dummett's Forward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism. Diametros 25:118-131.
Hans D. Sluga (1977). Frege's Alleged Realism. Inquiry 20 (1-4):227 – 242.
Added to index2010-11-09
Total downloads53 ( #24,539 of 1,010,916 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #28,090 of 1,010,916 )
How can I increase my downloads?