No Problem
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):583-591 (2009)
| Abstract | Is the human zygote and human embryo a human being? Such questions are biological questions (although philosophy may helpfully be drawn upon in rebutting objections and clarifying concepts). The issue of personhood is thus best kept entirely off the table when that question is being discussed. What is, or is not, possible for ontological persons, and what would, or would not, be morallywarranted for moral persons, should not play a role in the assessment of biological evidence with a view to answering the biological question. Yet this is what happens in a recent essay by Bernard Prusak (ACPQ 82:3 [Summer 2008]), an essay devoted to showing why the “problem of the embryo” will always be with us. More careful attention to developmental biology, and greater care in distinguishing scientific from metaphysical and ethical questions, would go some way towards making the problem of the embryo less intractable than Prusak believes | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBernard G. Prusak (2009). What Was to Be Demonstrated. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):593-597.
Bernard G. Prusak (2008). The Problem with the Problem of the Embryo. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):503-521.
E. Christian Brugger (2009). “Other Selves”: Moral and Legal Proposals Regarding the Personhood of Cryopreserved Human Embryos. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):105-129.
Louis M. Guenin (2008). The Morality of Embryo Use. Cambridge University Press.
Laura Palazzani (2012). Embryo Research in Italy: The Bioethical and Biojuridical Debate. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):28-39.
Gregory E. Ganssle (2005). Metaphysics, Ethics and Personhood. Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):370-376.
Robert C. Cefalo (1989). The Zygote: To Be or Not Be a Person. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6).
Gregory E. Ganssle (2005). Metaphysics, Ethics and Personhood: A Response to Kevin Corcoran. Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):370-376.
Thomas F. Banchoff (2011). Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies. Cornell University Press.
David Albert Jones (2012). The “Special Status” of the Human Embryo in the United Kingdom: An Exploration of the Use of Language in Public Policy. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):66-83.
Mark Brown (2013). No Ethical Bypass of Moral Status in Stem Cell Research. Bioethics 27 (1):12-19.
Mark T. Brown (2007). The Potential of the Human Embryo. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):585 – 618.
John Burgess (2010). Could a Zygote Be a Human Being? Bioethics 24 (2):61-70.
John F. Crosby (1993). The Personhood of the Human Embryo. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (4):399-417.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
