Graduate studies at Western
Res Publica 14 (2):101-116 (2008)
|Abstract||A common anti-egalitarian argument is that equality is motivated by envy, or the desire to placate envy. In order to avoid this charge, John Rawls explicitly banishes envy from his original position. This article argues that this is an inconsistent and untenable position for Rawls, as he treats envy as if it were a fact of human psychology and believes that principles of justice should be based on such facts. Therefore envy should be known about in the original position. The consequences for Rawlsian theory—both substantive and methodological—are discussed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Williams (2004). Equality, Ambition and Insurance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):131–150.
Michael Otsuka (2004). Equality, Ambition and Insurance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):151–166.
Aaron Ben-Ze'ev (2002). Are Envy, Anger, and Resentment Moral Emotions? Philosophical Explorations 5 (2):148 – 154.
Luke Purshouse (2004). Jealousy in Relation to Envy. Erkenntnis 60 (2):179-205.
Miriam Cohen Christofidis (2004). Talent, Slavery and Envy in Dworkin's Equality of Resources. Utilitas 16 (3):267-287.
John Ahier & John Beck (2003). Education and the Politics of Envy. British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (4):320 - 343.
Joseph Heath (2006). Envy and Efficiency. Revue de Philosophie Économique 13.
Stan Van Hooft (2002). La Caze on Envy and Resentment. Philosophical Explorations 5 (2):141 – 147.
Marguerite La Caze (2001). Envy and Resentment. Philosophical Explorations 4 (1):31 – 45.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #10,694 of 755,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,366 of 755,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?