Multi-Dimensional Utility and the Index Number Problem: Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill, and Qualitative Hedonism
Utilitas 12 (02):176- (2000)
|Abstract||This article develops an unconventional perspective on the utilitarianism of Bentham and Mill in at least four areas. First, it is shown that both authors conceived of utility as irreducibly multi-dimensional, and that Bentham in particular was very much aware of the ambiguity that multi-dimensionality imposes upon optimal choice under the greatest happiness principle. Secondly, I argue that any attribution of intrinsic worth to any form of human behaviour violates the first principles of Bentham's and Mill's utilitarianism, and that this renders both authors immune to the claim by G. E. Moore that they committed a . Thirdly, in light of these contentions, I find no flaw in Mill's . Fourthly, I use the notion of intrapersonal utility weights to provide an interpretation of Mill's qualitative hedonism that is entirely consistent with his value monism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dale Dorsey (2010). Hutcheson's Deceptive Hedonism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):445-467.
William Sweet, Jeremy Bentham. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Guy Fletcher (2008). 'Mill, Moore, and Intrinsic Value'. Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):517-32.
Philip Schofield (2009). Bentham: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York ;Continuum.
Kristian Urstad, Hedonism - Some Aspects and Insights. Canadian Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill & John Austin (1962). Utilitarianism. William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.
J. H. Burns (2005). Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham's Equation. Utilitas 17 (1):46-61.
Jeremy Bentham (1996). The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon Press.
Douglas G. Long (1990). 'Utility' and the 'Utility Principle': Hume, Smith, Bentham, Mill. Utilitas 2 (01):12-.
Philip Schofield (2009). Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. OUP Oxford.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1999). The Relation Between Jeremy Bentham's Psychological, and His Ethical, Hedonism. Utilitas 11 (03):296-.
David Lyons (1991). In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law. Oxford University Press.
David Collard (2006). Research on Well-Being: Some Advice From Jeremy Bentham. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):330-354.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads15 ( #85,965 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,098 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?