Behavior Analysis, Common Sense, and Logic: Reply to Barnes-Holmes
Behavior and Philosophy 33:81 - 84 (2005)
| Abstract | Barnes-Holmes characterizes his views as a-ontological, not antirealist. My criticisms still apply. Barnes-Holmes has not given any good reason to accept antirealism, nor has he given any good reason to accept an a-ontological position. Because his views, a-ontological or otherwise, are contradicted by ubiquitous aspects of the theory and practice of behavior analysis, these views should be rejected until supported by new and better arguments. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Dermot Barnes-Holmes (2005). Behavioral Pragmatism Is A-Ontological, Not Antirealist: A Reply to Tonneau. Behavior and Philosophy 33:67 - 79.
Emilio Ribes-Iñesta (2001). Stepping Down to the Foundations Is Needed to Remedy Conceptual Confusion: A Final Reply to O'Hora and Barnes-Holmes. Behavior and Philosophy 29:61 - 62.
Denis O'Hora & Dermot Barnes-Holmes (2001). Stepping Up to the Challenge of Complex Human Behavior: A Response to Ribes-Iñesta's Response. Behavior and Philosophy 29:59 - 60.
Emilio Ribes-Iñesta (2001). About Persistent Conceptual Confusion: A Response to O'Hora and Barnes-Holmes. Behavior and Philosophy 29:27 - 29.
François Tonneau (2005). Antirealist Arguments in Behavior Analysis. Behavior and Philosophy 33:55 - 65.
Denis O'Hora & Dermot Barnes-Holmes (2001). The Referential Nature of Rules and Instructions: A Response to Instructions, Rules, and Abstraction: A Misconstrued Relation by Emilio Ribes-Iñesta. Behavior and Philosophy 29:21 - 25.
Dermot Barnes-Holmes (2003). For the Radical Behaviorist Biological Events Are Not Biological and Public Events Are Not Public. Behavior and Philosophy 31:145 - 150.
Stefano Predelli (2002). 'Holmes'and Holmes—a Millian Analysis of Names From Fiction. Dialectica 56 (3):261–279.
Philippa Foot (1974). 'Is Morality a System of Hypothetical Imperatives?' A Reply to Mr. Holmes. Analysis 35 (2):53 - 56.
J. Moore (2003). Some Further Thoughts on the Pragmatic and Behavioral Conception of Private Events. Behavior and Philosophy 31:151 - 157.
Wulf Rehder (1979). Sherlock Holmes ‐ Philosopher Detective. Inquiry 22 (1-4):441-457.
Roy A. Moxley (1997). Skinner: From Determinism to Random Variation. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (1):3 - 28.
Ba (2004). On the Ontological Issue of Sense Data. Philosophia 33 (2):125-154.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |

