David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (2):245-264 (1998)
The paper justifies the concept of “thematic structure” or “order of knowledge” over the traditional “classification of sciences” due to the uncertainty of many classification criteria. The thematic structure of science has, of course, various levels and various dimensions. Arguments against any forms of separating the humanities from sciences in the traditional sense of the term are presented and discussed. Equally unacceptable are attempts at sharp separation of technical disciplines and humanities. The thematic structure of humanities is not created by some material aspects but rather through the interest — or problem-oriented aspects. In addition to the natural sciences and the humanities there exists an important sphere of sciences on artefacts or, using the term by H. Simon, the sciences of the artificial. For the contemporary research activities is typical what could be denoted as “interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary complex.” The paper traces a set of epistemological criteria for the justification of the relative independence of a scientific discipline.
|Keywords||thematic structure order of knowledge classification ofsciences natural sciences humanities the sciences of the artificial interdisciplinary complex|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paola Spinozzi & Alessandro Zironi (eds.) (2010). Origins as a Paradigm in the Sciences and in the Humanities. V & R Unipress.
Cecilia Tohaneanu (2010). “The Human Between the «Life-World»and Its Theoretical (Re)Construction”. Review of Research and Social Intervention/Revista de Cercetare Si Intervenţie Socială 31:95-105.
Edward G. Slingerland (2008). What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge University Press.
William A. Stephany (1989). Thematic Structure in Augustine's Confessions. Augustinian Studies 20:129-142.
F. Rapport (2004). Special Thematic Issue of Medical Humanities: Constructions of Self in Health and Illness. Medical Humanities 30 (1):4-4.
R. John Bench (1989). Health Science, Natural Science, and Clinical Knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):147-164.
Robert L. Causey (2005). What is Structure? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):441-462.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2006). Interdisciplinarity and Peirce's Classification of the Sciences: A Centennial Reassessment. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):127-152.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #235,035 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?