Markets or Democracy for Education? A Reply to Stewart Ranson
British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):21 - 34 (1995)
| Abstract | This paper, which offers a positive assessment of the role of markets in education, is a 'reply' to an earlier contribution to the Journal (41, 4)in which Stewart Ranson argues that markets are intrinsically flawed as a vehicle for improving educational opportunities. The 'reply', among other things, argues that Ranson fails to address the shortcomings of education under democratic control and ignores the educational benefits of authentic markets. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStewart Ranson (1993). Markets or Democracy for Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 41 (4):333 - 352.
Stewart Ranson (1995). Public Institutions for Cooperative Action: A Reply to James Tooley. British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):35 - 42.
Christopher Winch (1998). Markets, Educational Opportunities and Education: Reply to Tooley. Journal of Philosophy of Education 32 (3):429–436.
James Tooley (1994). Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America's Schools. Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (2):257–264.
Michael Stewart (1938). Bias and Education for Democracy. London, Oxford University Press, H. Milford.
Sally Power (2006). Markets and Misogyny: Educational Research on Educational Choice. British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (2):175 - 188.
Stewart Ranson, Jane Martin, Jon Nixon & Penny McKeown (1996). Towards a Theory of Learning. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (1):9 - 26.
Kelvin Stewart Beckett (2011). R.S. Peters and the Concept of Education. Educational Theory 61 (3):239-255.
James Tarrant (1996). Education and Conceptions of Democracy: A Reply to Bonna Haberman. Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (2):289–293.
Debra Satz (2008). The Moral Limits of Markets: The Case of Human Kidneys. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
James Stacey Taylor (2006). Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325 - 335.
Daniel M. Hausman (1989). Are Markets Morally Free Zones? Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (4):317-333.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads2 ( #232,381 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
