David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 38 (2):281-296 (2010)
I present a new problem for the tense realist concerning the evaluation of cross-temporal claims, such as ‘John is now taller than Michael was in 1984’. Time can play two different roles in the evaluation of an utterance of a sentence: either as an element that completes the content expressed by the utterance (the completion role), or as part of the circumstances against which the content is evaluated (the evaluation role). It is this latter role that time plays in the realist view of tenses. I argue that if the content of a cross-temporal sentence is taken at face value (as an ascription of a crosstemporally instantiated relation), time does not play the evaluation role. Therefore, the world of the tense realist seems to leave no room for cross-temporality.
|Keywords||Cross-temporality Tense realism Tense logic Perspective McTaggart|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Almog, John Perry, Howard K. Wettstein & David Kaplan (eds.) (1989). Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press, USA.
John Bigelow (1996). Presentism and Properties. Philosophical Perspectives 10 (Metaphysics):35-52.
Craig Bourne (2006). A Future for Presentism. Oxford University Press.
Berit Brogaard (2006). Tensed Relations. Analysis 66 (3):194–202.
Citations of this work BETA
Giuliano Torrengo (2014). Ostrich Presentism. Philosophical Studies 170 (2):255-276.
Similar books and articles
Rafael De Clercq (2006). Presentism and the Problem of Cross-Time Relations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):386-402.
Sebastian Watzl (2013). Silencing the Experience of Change. Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1009-1032.
John F. DeCarlo (2010). The Poisoning of Hamlet's Temporal Subjectivity. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (12):30-40.
W. G. Kudszus (1997). Acknowledgements. The Chesterton Review 23 (1-2):3-3.
Michael J. Futch (2002). Leibniz's Non-Tensed Theory of Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):125 – 139.
Katalin Farkas (2008). Time, Tense, Truth. Synthese 160 (2):269 - 284.
Christoph Hoerl (2009). Time and Tense in Perceptual Experience. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (12):1-18.
M. Gregory Oakes (2007). Can Indirect Causation Be Real? Metaphysica 8 (2):111-122.
Added to index2009-10-21
Total downloads27 ( #75,565 of 1,679,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,911 of 1,679,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?