David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (3):197-215 (2011)
The scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change is firmly established yet climate change denialism, a species of what I call pseudoskepticism, is on the rise in industrial nations most responsible for climate change. Such denialism suggests the need for a robust ethics of inquiry and public discourse. In this paper I argue: (1) that ethical obligations of inquiry extend to every voting citizen insofar as citizens are bound together as a political body. (2) It is morally condemnable for public officials to put forward assertions contrary to scientific consensus when such consensus is decisive for public policy and legislation. (3) It is imperative upon educators, journalists, politicians and all those with greater access to the public forum to condemn, factually and ethically, pseudoskeptical assertions made in the public realm without equivocation.
|Keywords||John Rawls W.K. Clifford Public Reason Climate Change Inquiry Belief Ethics Science Global Warming|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lawrence Torcello (2016). The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse. Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):19-48.
Karin Jønch-Clausen & Klemens Kappel (forthcoming). Scientific Facts and Methods in Public Reason. Res Publica:1-17.
Similar books and articles
Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson (1997). Scientific Discovery Based on Belief Revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1352-1370.
Antonio López Peláez & José Antonio Díaz (2007). Science, Technology and Democracy: Perspectives About the Complex Relation Between the Scientific Community, the Scientific Journalist and Public Opinion. Social Epistemology 21 (1):55 – 68.
Christopher Tollefsen (2008). Biomedical Research and Beyond: Expanding the Ethics of Inquiry. Routledge.
Asaf Bar-Tura (2010). Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres. Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
Peggy Ruth Geren (2001). Public Discourse: Creating the Conditions for Dialogue Concerning the Common Good in a Postmodern Heterogeneous Democracy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):191-199.
Adela Cortina (2009). Bioethics and Public Reason: A Report on Ethics and Public Discourse in Spain. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):241.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (1999). Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197-212.
William Stempsey (2011). Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
Elizabeth Anderson (2011). Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony. Episteme 8 (2):144-164.
Dane Scott (2003). Science and the Consequences of Mistruct: Lessons From Recent GM Controversies. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):569-582.
Sheila Jasanoff (1996). Is Science Socially Constructed—and Can It Still Inform Public Policy? Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):263-276.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (1999). Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197 – 212.
Added to index2011-04-21
Total downloads366 ( #3,859 of 1,790,256 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #27,122 of 1,790,256 )
How can I increase my downloads?