David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):44 – 56 (2007)
Under the umbrella of the burgeoning neurotransdisciplines, scholars are using the principles and research methodologies of their primary and secondary fields to examine developments in neuroimaging, neuromodulation and psychopharmacology. The path for advanced scholarship at the intersection of law and neuroscience may clear if work across the disciplines is collected and reviewed and outstanding and debated issues are identified and clarified. In this article, I organize, examine and refine a narrow class of the burgeoning neurotransdiscipline scholarship; that is, scholarship at the interface of law and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard G. Boire (2005). Searching the Brain: The Fourth Amendment Implications of Brain-Based Deception Detection Devices. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):62-63.
Naomi I. Eisenberger & Matthew D. Lieberman (2004). Why Rejection Hurts: A Common Neural Alarm System for Physical and Social Pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7):294-300.
Martha J. Farah (2005). Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):34-40.
Linda MacDonald Glenn (2005). Keeping an Open Mind: What Legal Safeguards Are Needed? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):60-61.
Henry T. Greely (2005). Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detections: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):50-52.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Nicole A. Vincent, Pim Haselager & Gert-Jan Lokhorst (2011). “The Neuroscience of Responsibility”—Workshop Report. Neuroethics 4 (2):175-178.
Susan M. Wolf (2008). Neurolaw: The Big Question. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):21 – 22.
M. Farisco & C. Petrini (2012). The Impact of Neuroscience and Genetics on the Law: A Recent Italian Case. Neuroethics 5 (3):317-319.
Rob Schwartz & Mirra Schwartz (2008). The Risks of Reducing Consciousness to Neuroimaging. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (9):25 – 26.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Crowe (2012). Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence 2 (2):293-308.
Colin Klein (2010). Philosophical Issues in Neuroimaging. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):186-198.
Kim Celone & Chantal Stern (2009). A Neuroimaging Perspective on the Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in Educational and Legal Systems. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):28 – 29.
Stacey A. Tovino (2005). The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (4):844-850.
Lisa J. Burklund & Matthew D. Lieberman (2012). Advances in Functional Neuroimaging of Psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):333-337.
Alan Strudler (2010). New Directions in Legal Scholarship. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):503-531.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #215,417 of 1,699,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?