David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):271-277 (2004)
Plagiarism is the misuse of and failure to acknowledge source materials. This paper questions common responses to the apparent increase in plagiarism by students. Internet plagiarism occurs in a context – using the Internet as an information tool – where the relevant norms are far from obvious and models of virtue are difficult to identify and perhaps impossible to find. Ethical responses to the pervasiveness of Internet-enhanced plagiarism require a reorientation of perspective on both plagiarism and the Internet as a knowledge tool. Technological strategies to “catch the cheats” send a “don’t get caught” message to students and direct the limited resources of academic institutions to a battle that cannot be won. More importantly, it is not the right battleground. Rather than characterising Internet-enabled plagiarism as a problem generated and solvable by emerging technologies, we argue that there is a more urgent need to build the background conditions that enable and sustain ethical relationships and academic virtues: to nurture an intellectual community.
|Keywords||Internet community ethics plagiarism trust|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Shannon Vallor (2010). Social Networking Technology and the Virtues. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):157-170.
Mathieu Bouville (2008). Plagiarism: Words and Ideas. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):311-322.
Mitch Parsell (2008). Pernicious Virtual Communities: Identity, Polarisation and the Web 2. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):41-56.
Bo Brinkman (2013). An Analysis of Student Privacy Rights in the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1255-1266.
Mary Walker & Cynthia Townley (2012). Contract Cheating: A New Challenge for Academic Honesty? [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (1):27-44.
Similar books and articles
Brook J. Sadler (2007). The Wrongs of Plagiarism: Ten Quick Arguments. Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):283-291.
Rubén Comas-Forgas & Jaume Sureda-Negre (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
Jaume Sureda-Negre (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
Niall Hayes & Lucas Introna (2005). Systems for the Production of Plagiarists? The Implications Arising From the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems in UK Universities for Asian Learners. Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (1):55-73.
Richard Reilly, Samuel Pry & Mark L. Thomas (2007). Plagiarism. Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):269-282.
Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):293 - 306.
Bruce R. Lewis, Jonathan E. Duchac & S. Douglas Beets (2011). An Academic Publisher's Response to Plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):489-506.
Babak Sohrabi, Aryan Gholipour & Neda Mohammadesmaeili (2011). Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):367 - 379.
Dominic A. Sisti (2007). How Do High School Students Justify Internet Plagiarism? Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):215 – 231.
Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud (2009). Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-Use? Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #118,642 of 1,911,469 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #143,244 of 1,911,469 )
How can I increase my downloads?