The pathologies of standard analytic epistemology
Noûs 39 (4):696–714 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMárta Ujvári (1993). Analytic Philosophy Challenged. Scepticism and Arguing Transcendentally. Erkenntnis 39 (3):285 - 304.
Panayot Butchvarov (2008). Epistemology Dehumanized. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
Frederick Grinnell (1987). Responses to 'Pathologies of Science'. Social Epistemology 1 (3):249 – 281.
Harry Redner (1987). Pathologies of Science. Social Epistemology 1 (3):215 – 247.
Stephen Stich (2006). Review of Bishop & Tout, Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgement. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (458):390-393.
Joshua Alexander & Jonathan M. Weinberg (2007). Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 2 (1):56–80.
J. D. Trout & Michael A. Bishop (2005). Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Oxford University Press.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2008). Strategic Reliabilism and the Replacement Thesis in Epistemology. Dialogue 47 (3-4):425-.
Michael Bishop & J. D. Trout (2005). The Pathologies of Standard Analytic Epistemology. Noûs 39 (4):696 - 714.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads53 ( #19,296 of 548,941 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,941 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
