David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:211-228 (2002)
In this paper I consider how Aquinas has been interpreted by continental philosophers of religion and particularly in relation to the problem of ontotheology. A patient examination of the texts of those who have dealt with Aquinas reveals two basic problems. First, there is an underestimation of the radicality of Aquinas’s negative theology. Second, no account is taken of the way Aquinas understands the relationship between reason and revelation. Aquinas’s position on this relationship is even more crucial for the overcoming of onto-theology than is his negative theology. From a Christian perspective, what is at stake in overcoming onto-theology is the issue of keeping philosophical theology from overstepping its bounds and intruding on the domain of revelation. Revelation is the final standard when it comes to God-talk. If negative theology is to be done properly, it must be integrated into a theological position like Aquinas’s that, while granting reason and revelation each their legitimate “autonomy,” gives priority to the latter in questions of theology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. L. A. West (2007). The Functioning of Philosophy in Aquinas. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):383-394.
Brian Davies (ed.) (2002). Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Norman Kretzmann (2001). The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I. Clarendon Press.
Brian Davies (1993). The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Clarendon Press.
Eleonore Stump (2003). Aquinas. Routledge.
Joseph G. Trabbic (2003). Maimonides, Aquinas, and Interreligious Dialogue. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:221-234.
Eileen C. Sweeney (2009). Seeing Double. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):389-420.
Norman Kretzmann (1999). The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles Ii. Clarendon Press.
Russell Pannier (2001). Getting a Grip on the Philosophies of Thomas Aquinas. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):50-60.
Kenneth J. Konyndyk (1995). Aquinas on Faith and Science. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):3-21.
Rudi A. Te Velde (2003). ‘The First Thing to Know About God’: Kretzmann and Aquinas on the Meaning and Necessity of Arguments for the Existence of God. Religious Studies 39 (3):251-267.
Frank Lucash (2001). Revelation in Spinoza's Theological-Political Treatise. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):73-92.
Thomas Sullivan & Russell Pannier (2001). Getting a Grip on the Philosophies of Thomas Aquinas: A Defense of Systematic Reconstruction. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):50-60.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads14 ( #184,535 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #118,705 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?