Doing Philosophy in Style: A New Look at the Analytic/Continental Divide

Philosophy Compass 7 (12):919-942 (2012)
Abstract
Questions of style are often deemed of marginal importance in philosophy, as well as in metaphilosophical debates concerning the analytic/Continental divide. I take issue with this common tendency by showing how style – suitably conceived not merely as a way of writing, but as a form of expression intimately linked to a form of life – occupies a central role in philosophy. After providing an analysis of the concept of style, I take a fresh look at the analytic/Continental division by examining the various stylistic differences between philosophers on each side. Despite these differences, I argue, both sides of the divide suffer from a common stylistic deficiency, and if this deficiency were rectified the gulf separating the two traditions may not appear as insurmountable as it presently does. To show this, I draw principally from the philosophy of religion, a field that has recently experienced a renewal in both the analytic and Continental traditions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,738
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Monroe Beardsley (1979). Verbal Style and Illocutionary Action. In Leonard B. Meyer & Berel Lang (eds.), The Concept of Style. University of Pennsylvania Press. 149--168.
Stephen Buckle (2004). Analytic Philosophy and Continental Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):111 – 150.

View all 30 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Simon Critchley (1997). What is Continental Philosophy? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.
Peter Simons (2001). Whose Fault? The Origins and Evitability of the Analytic-Continental Rift. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):295 – 311.
Jack Reynolds (2009). "Continental Philosophy and Chickening Out". International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):255-72.
Marcelo Dascal (2001). How Rational Can a Polemic Across the Analytic -Continental 'Divide' Be? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):313 – 339.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-11-29

Total downloads

18 ( #103,336 of 1,413,453 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #94,648 of 1,413,453 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.