David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 39 (4):451-458 (2003)
Kirk Durston recently presented an argument aimed against evidential arguments from evil predicated on instances of suffering that appear to be gratuitous; ‘The consequential complexity of history and gratuitous evil’, Religious Studies, 36 (2000), 65–80. He begins with the notion that history consists of an intricate web of causal chains, so that a single event in one such chain may have countless unforeseen consequences. According to Durston, this consequential complexity exhibited by history negatively impacts on our grasp of the data necessary to determine whether or not an evil is gratuitous. He therefore concludes that our epistemic condition poses an insurmountable barrier towards the inference from inscrutability to pointlessness. By way of reply, I contend that Durston's argument is flawed in two significant respects, and thus the evidential argument emerges unscathed from his critique.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Justin P. McBrayer (2010). Skeptical Theism. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Similar books and articles
Del Kiernan-Lewis (2007). Naturalism and the Problem of Evil. Philo 10 (2):125-135.
Kirk Durston (2000). The Consequential Complexity of History and Gratuitous Evil. Religious Studies 36 (1):65-80.
Kirk K. Durston (2005). The Failure of Type-4 Arguments From Evil, in the Face of the Consequential Complexity of History. Philo 8 (2):109-122.
Nick Trakakis (2006). Why There is Reason to Remain Sceptical of Durston's Scepticism. Religious Studies 42 (1):101-109.
Robert Bass (2011). Many Inscrutable Evils. Ars Disputandi 11:118-132.
James Beilby (1996). Does the Empirical Problem of Evil Prove That Theism Is Improbable? Religious Studies 32 (3):315 - 323.
David O'Connor (1995). Hasker on Gratuitous Natural Evil. Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):380-392.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (1996). INTRODUCTION: The Evidential Argument From Evil. In The Evidential Argument from Evil.
Kirk Durston (2006). The Complexity of History and Evil: A Reply to Trakakis. Religious Studies 42 (1):87-99.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #115,725 of 1,102,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,741 of 1,102,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?