Generality, efficiency, and neutrality: Must laws be general to be legitimate?
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):26–50 (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDestutt de Tracy & Antoine Louis Claude (1811/2006). A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws: Prepared for Press From the Original. Lawbook Exchange.
Leon Horsten (1995). The Semantical Paradoxes, the Neutrality of Truth and the Neutrality of the Minimalist Theory of Truth. In P. Cartois (ed.), The Many Problems of Realism (Studies in the General Philosophy of Science: Volume 3). Tilberg University Press.
Matthew Smith (2009). Legal Truths and Falsities. Ratio Juris 22 (1):95-109.
Jonathan Adler & Michael Levin (2002). Is the Generality Problem Too General? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):87-97.
Michael Levin (2002). Is the Generality Problem Too General? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):87 - 97.
Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen (2011). A Conflict Between Representation and Neutrality. Philosophical Papers 39 (1):69-96.
Zhidas Daskalovski (2002). Neutrality, Liberal Nation Building and Minority Cultural Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):27-50.
William A. Edmundson (1998). Legitimate Authority Without Political Obligation. Law and Philosophy 17 (1):43 - 60.
Miriam Solomon (1995). Naturalism and Generality. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):353 – 363.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,652 of 549,063 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
