Is Obtaining an Arrestee's DNA a Valid Special Needs Search Under the Fourth Amendment? What Should (and Will) the Supreme Court Do?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (1):102-124 (2005)
A small number of states have enacted laws that authorize the taking and analysis of DNA from certain categories of arrestees. This article addresses the constitutionality, under the Fourth Amendment, of taking DNA samples from persons subject to arrest
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tania Simoncelli (2006). Dangerous Excursions: The Case Against Expanding Forensic DNA Databases to Innocent Persons. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2):390-397.
Similar books and articles
Charles J. Nerko, Assessing Fourth Amendment Challenges to DNA Extraction Statutes After Samson V. California.
Dan Fenske, All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic: Erasing the Distinction Between Foreign and Domestic Intelligence Gathering Under the Fourth Amendment.
Dolores A. Donovan, Informers Revisited: Government Surveillance of Domestic Political Organizations and the Fourth and First Amendments.
Holly K. Fernandez (2005). Genetic Privacy, Abandonment, and DNA Dragnets: Is Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Adequate? Hastings Center Report 35 (1):21-23.
Patrick J. Glen, The Nonconstitutional Character of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Immigration Proceedings: A Brief Comment on Afanwi V. Mukasey.
Kevin M. Stack, The Story of Morrison V. Olson: The Independent Counsel and Independent Agencies in Watergate's Wake.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2004). The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Noûs 38 (1):135–153.
Christian Halliburton, Letting Katz Out of the Bag: Cognitive Freedom and Fourth Amendment Fidelity.
Theodore W. Ruger (2004). The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
Simon Butt, The Constitutional Court's Decision in the Dispute Between the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission: Banishing Judicial Accountability?
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads11 ( #312,747 of 1,907,232 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,442 of 1,907,232 )
How can I increase my downloads?