Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):95-124 (2007)
|Abstract||In this article, I speak self-consciously as a man of faith addressing both believers and non-believers, but with the latter especially in mind. I suggest that we are currently witnessing (i) a highly significant departure from the ‘old’ model of liberal society that championed a sacred-secular divide, where the state was (only) a neutral umpire with a deliberately cultivated attitude of ‘studied public indifference’ to the ‘inner life’ of the vast host of (private) associations that itwas obliged to impartially regulate, and (ii) a transition to a ‘new’ post-secular model of liberal society that champions and promotes a sacred-secular distinction (a complementary unity of distinct aspects), where the state is obliged to rethink itself and become (also) the state of its society. In this respect, it resembles the state in the era of Christendom. I hold that Rawls and Habermas are handicapped in their efforts to theorise post-secular society as a result of their strong anti-metaphysical posture|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brian T. Trainor (2011). Augustine's 'Sacred Reign‐Secular Rule' Conception of the State; a Bridge From the West's' Foundational Roots to its Post‐Secular Destiny, and Between 'the West' and 'the Rest'. Heythrop Journal 54 (5).
Lauren F. Pfister (2012). Post-Secularity Within Contemporary Chinese Philosophical Contexts. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):121-138.
M. Rosati (2010). Post-Secular Society, Transnational Religious Civilizations and Legal Pluralism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):413-423.
David Kim, David McCalman & Dan Fisher (2012). The Sacred/Secular Divide and the Christian Worldview. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):203-208.
Roberto Frega (2012). Equal Accessibility to All: Habermas, Pragmatism, and the Place of Religious Beliefs in a Post-Secular Society. Constellations 19 (2):267-287.
David Hawkes (2007). The Secular and the Post-Secular in the Thought of Edward Said. In Mark Bevir, Jill Hargis & Sara Rushing (eds.), Histories of Postmodernism. Routledge.
Janos Toth (2013). Similarities and Differences in Perennial and Post-Secular Approaches to Society. In Pál Eszter Somlai Péter & Szabari Vera (eds.), Kötő-Jelek 2011. Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem.
A. Ferrara (2009). The Separation of Religion and Politics in a Post-Secular Society. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (1-2):77-91.
John Betz (2009). After Enlightenment: The Post-Secular Vision of J.G. Hamann. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Torbjörn Tännsjö (1995). The Secular Model of the Multi‐Cultural State. Inquiry 38 (1-2):109-117.
Feisal G. Mohamed (2011). Milton and the Post-Secular Present: Ethics, Politics, Terrorism. Stanford University Press.
Edmund F. Byrne (2010). Why and How Secular Society Should Accommodate Religion: A Philosophical Proposal. Edwin Mellen Press.
Martin Kavka (2012). WHAT IS IMMANENT IN JUDAISM? Transcending A Secular Age. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):123-137.
Omid Payrow Shabani (2008). Freedom of Religion, Democracy and the Fact of Pluralism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:729-747.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?