Mind 113 (449):57-94 (2004)
|Abstract||There is a view abroad on which (a) perceptual experience has (a) representational content in this sense: in it something is represented to the perceiver as so. On the view, a perceptual experience has a face value at which it may be taken, or which may be rejected. This paper argues that that view is mistaken: there is nothing in perceptual experience which makes it so that in it anything is represented as so (except insofar as the perceiver represents things to himself as so). In that sense, the senses are silent, or, in Austin's term, dumb. Perceptual experience is not as such either veridical or delusive. It may mislead, but it does not take representation to accomplish that|
|Keywords||Content Experience Metaphysics Perception Representation Harman, G Mcdowell, J|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Akeel Bilgrami (1994). On McDowell on the Content of Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (175):206-13.
J. Dokic (1998). The Ontology of Perception: Bipolarity and Content. Erkenntnis 48 (2):153-69.
Anders Nes (2006). Content in Thought and Perception. Dissertation, Oxford University
Brad J. Thompson (2010). The Spatial Content of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):146-184.
Sean D. Kelly (2001). The Non-Conceptual Content of Perceptual Experience: Situation Dependence and Fineness of Grain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):601-608.
Hannah Ginsborg (2011). Perception, Generality, and Reasons. In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
Bill Brewer (2006). Perception and Content. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):165-181.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads258 ( #716 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #4,170 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?