Unrecognized Particulars: A Reply to Mr. Barber

Dialogue 5 (04):584-585 (1967)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300033771
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Laird Addis (1967). Particulars and Acquaintance. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):251-259.
James Tooley (1999). New Versus Old Barber: An Unfinished Revolution. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (1):28 - 42.
Noa Latham (2002). Spatiotemporal and Spatial Particulars. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):17-35.
Richard L. Barber (1953). Being and Possibility: A Reply. Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):605 - 616.
Peter Adamson (2005). On Knowledge of Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
Kevjn Lim (2009). God's Knowledge of Particulars. Journal of Islamic Philosophy 5:75-98.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index


Total downloads

1 ( #647,778 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.