Quantum paradoxes, time, and derivation of thermodynamic law: Opportunities from change of energy paradigm
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):287 - 306 (2006)
Well known quantum and time paradoxes, and the difficulty to derive the second law of thermodynamics, are proposed to be the result of our historically grown paradigm for energy: it is just there, the capacity to do work, not directly related to change. When the asymmetric nature of energy is considered, as well as the involvement of energy turnover in any change, so that energy can be understood as fundamentally "dynamic", and time-oriented (new paradigm), these paradoxes and problems dissolve. The most basic consequence concerns the particle-wave dualism. For a reversible inter-conversion of a particle into a wave, subject to a dynamic energy, a self-image of information has to be generated: quantum theory has to be complemented by a theory of information. Then, quantum processes can be derived from classical ones and the second law of thermodynamics with the tendency of increasing entropy follows in a straightforward way
|Keywords||energy energy-time concept paradigm change quantum paradoxes second law of thermodynamics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. S. Bell (2004 ). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press 14--21.
Michael Esfeld (2004). Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):601-617.
Paul Davies (1977). The Physics of Time Asymmetry. University of California Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pedro L. Garrido, Sheldon Goldstein, Jani Lukkarinen & Roderich Tumulka, Paradoxical Reflection in Quantum Mechanics.
Basil J. Hiley & Paavo Pylkkanen (2005). Can Mind Affect Matter Via Active Information? Mind and Matter 3 (2):8-27.
James A. Dixon, John G. Holden, Daniel Mirman & Damian G. Stephen (2012). Multifractal Dynamics in the Emergence of Cognitive Structure. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):51-62.
Constantin Antonopoulos (1997). Time as Non-Observational Knowledge: How to Straighten Out Δeδt≥H. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):165 – 183.
Peter J. Riggs (2008). Reflections on the Debroglie–Bohm Quantum Potential. Erkenntnis 68 (1):21 - 39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #78,738 of 1,938,712 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #124,239 of 1,938,712 )
How can I increase my downloads?