David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1973)
Can we justify our most basic beliefs about morality, religion and the nature of the world? Can there be a rational and objective way of choosing between alternative societies, modes of life or world-views? Dr Trigg shows how philosophical analysis is relevant to these questions and criticizes the tendency to emphasize notions of commitment and convention at the expense of truth and reason. He draws parallels between issues that are often too isolated from each other and identifies a cluster of related ideas, all of which stress the notion of self-contained conceptual systems that define their own standards of rationality. First published in 1973, this book will interest professional philosophers as a vigorous and distinctive exposition of several fundamental philosophical problems and more especially it can be used as an introduction for students to a wide range of philosophical problems.
|Keywords||Relativity Commitment (Psychology ) Ideology|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$36.49 new (19% off) $44.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B823.3.T73 1973|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Vasso P. Kindi (1995). Kuhn'sthe Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):75 - 92.
Derek L. Phillips (1975). Paradigms and Incommensurability. Theory and Society 2 (1):37-61.
Richard G. Bagnall (1990). Lifelong Education: The Institutionalisation of an Illiberal and Regressive Ideology? Educational Philosophy and Theory 22 (1):1–7.
Wentzel Huyssteen (1988). Experience and Explanation: The Justification of Cognitive Claims in Theology. Zygon 23 (3):247-260.
Kevin Schilbrack (2009). Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch. [REVIEW] Sophia 48 (4):399-412.
Similar books and articles
Sarah Stroud (2001). Moral Commitment and Moral Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:381-398.
Howard Peacock (2011). Two Kinds of Ontological Commitment. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):79-104.
Brendan Sweetman (2003). Commitment, Justification, and the Rejection of Natural Theology. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):417-436.
Roger Trigg (1976). Reason, Commitment and Social Anthropology. Philosophy 51 (196):219 - 222.
Isaac Levi (2002). Commitment and Change of View. In Jose Luis Bermudez & Alan Millar (eds.), Reason and Nature. Clarendon 209--232.
Charles A. Kiesler (1971). The Psychology of Commitment. New York,Academic Press.
Sheldon Richmond (1976). On the Possibility of Rationality: Some Comments on Roger Trigg's 'Reason and Commitment'. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (2):155-163.
Ward E. Jones (2003). Is Scientific Theory-Commitment Doxastic or Practical? Synthese 137 (3):325 - 344.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #461,818 of 1,796,448 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #347,907 of 1,796,448 )
How can I increase my downloads?