The Human Animal

Epoché 16 (2):269-285 (2012)
Abstract I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Like other natural beings, we strive to fulfill our end from the potential within us to achieve that end. Logos does not make human beings unnatural but makes us responsible for our actualization. As rational, the human can never be reduced to mere living animal but is always already concerned with living well; yet, as natural, she is not separated from the animal world, a dangerous distinction which inevitably leaves some persons reduced to mere animality
Keywords Aristotle  Philosophical Anthropology  Human Nature  Logos and Nature  Ancient  Ethics
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,664
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    John Deely (2005). Defining the Semiotic Animal. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):461-481.
    Richard Kraut (2007). Nature in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):199-219.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-09-18

    Total downloads

    2 ( #232,316 of 549,010 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,261 of 549,010 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums