Brain Death - Too Flawed to Endure, Too Ingrained to Abandon

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):273-281 (2007)
Abstract
The concept of brain death has become deeply ingrained in our health care system. It serves as the justification for the removal of vital organs like the heart and liver from patients who still have circulation and respiration while these organs maintain viability. On close examination, however, the concept is seen as incoherent and counterintuitive to our understandings of death. In order to abandon the concept of brain death and yet retain our practices in organ transplantation, we need to either change the definition of death or no longer maintain a commitment to the dead donor rule, which is an implicit prohibition against removing vital organs from individuals before they are declared dead. After exploring these two options, the author argues that while new definitions of death are problematic, alternatives to the dead donor rule are both ethically justifiable and potentially palatable to the public. Even so, the author concludes that neither of these approaches is likely to be adopted and that resolution will most probably come when technological advances in immunology simply make the concept of brain death obsolete
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,595
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
R. Alta Charo (2005). Realbioethik. Hastings Center Report 35 (4):13-14.
Robert M. Veatch (2003). The Dead Donor Rule: True by Definition. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):10 – 11.
Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations

Similar books and articles
Winston Chiong (2005). Brain Death Without Definitions. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
Douglas N. Walton (1981). Epistemology of Brain Death Determination. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):259-274.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-31

Total downloads

40 ( #51,993 of 1,692,523 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #57,596 of 1,692,523 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.