David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The main idea of quantum mechanics, whether formulated in terms of the Planck constant or the noncommutativity of certain observables, must be tied to the recognition of the relativity and nonuniversality of the abstract concept of set (manifold) in the description of quantum systems. This entails the necessarily probabilistic description of quantum systems: since a quantum system ultimately cannot be decomposed into elements or sets, we have to describe it in terms of probabilities of only a relative selection of certain elements or sets in its structure. This gives rise to the potential possibilities of quantum systems in an actual physical situation, and as a result the corresponding probabilities are ontologically real, like any other physically verifiable relationships. In this way, the quantum potential possibilities (and probabilities as their measure) are no less objectively real than the conventional reality which we identify with the physically directly verifiable elements, particles, etc. Indeed, the distribution of probabilities described by the nonfactorizable wave function is as objectively real and concrete as chairs, walls and all other physical things. In the pure quantum state the probabilities of selection of elements from the ultimately detailed state of the system are mutually coordinated and correlated by the phenomenon of wholeness of the system, and form an implicative logical structure governed by this phenomenon of wholeness. This idea of the implicative logical organization of the probabilistic structure of a quantum system in the so-called pure (non-detailable) state, and the governing role of the phenomenon of wholeness (in the redistribution of probabilities depending on the nature of the development of the real experiment), is in good agreement with the results of quantum correlation experiments (for example, the experiments of Alain Aspect, Nicolas Gisin and others)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chuang Liu (1994). The Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Reality of Wave Packets. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):977-1000.
Matthew Donald (1992). A Priori Probability and Localized Observers. Foundations of Physics 22 (9):1111-1172.
Don N. Page (1996). Sensible Quantum Mechanics: Are Probabilities Only in the Mind? International Journal of Modern Physics D 5:583-96.
Matthew J. Donald, Probabilities for Observing Mixed Quantum States Given Limited Prior Information.
László E. Szabó, The Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nancy Cartwright (1978). The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:54 - 59.
Dennis Dieks (2007). Probability in Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (2):292-310.
Alexey Kryukov (2007). On the Measurement Problem for a Two-Level Quantum System. Foundations of Physics 37 (1):3-39.
Michele Caponigro & Stefano Mancini (forthcoming). Can (Quantum) Information Be Sorted Out From Quantum Mechanics? NQ journal.
A. Sudbery (2002). Diese Verdammte Quantenspringerei. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (3):387-411.
Jeffrey Bub (1991). The Problem of Properties in Quantum Mechanics. Topoi 10 (1):27-34.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads5 ( #178,779 of 1,088,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #20,069 of 1,088,814 )
How can I increase my downloads?