The Role of Plurality and Context in Social Values

Abstract
The study of social values has its origins in the study of both cross cultural and within cultural differences in latent or manifest definitions of the right social order to achieve the good life. To this extent, the social scientific literature is replete with references to them. Yet, researchers either use the term values Social values are often used interchangeably with that of attitudes or treated as a post-hoc explanatory concept. When values are the focal research point, such endeavours predominantly depart from universal and reductionist understandings of their functions, meanings and structures. Through tracing the roots of key theoretical and empirical investigations in values, originating in the work of Charles Morris, Gordon Allport, Florence Kluckhohn and Fred Strodtbeck, Milton Rokeach and Shalom Schwartz, we reveal the common as well as the different tenets underpinning their work. It will be shown that these accounts have lost sight of the importance of plurality and context. We claim that a renewed program of research in values is needed, which should be characterised by methodological pluralism in order to investigate a) value plurality, b) value specificity and c) values as properties and as processes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,371
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
J. Dewey (1939). T Heory of Valuation. In J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1925--1953. Southern Illinois University Press.
Arthur O. Lovejoy (1950). Terminal and Adjectival Values. Journal of Philosophy 47 (21):593-608.
Charles William Morris (1956). Varieties of Human Value. [Chicago]University of Chicago Press.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Jean Hillier (1999). What Values? Whose Values? Philosophy and Geography 2 (2):179 – 199.
Wenceslao J. González (2008). Economic Values in the Configuration of Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):85-112.
Bert H. Hodges (2004). Asch and the Balance of Values. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):343-344.
Tom Kitwood (1977). What Does 'Having Values' Mean? Journal of Moral Education 6 (2):81-89.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2011-06-15

Total downloads

3 ( #297,594 of 1,102,845 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.