Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):397-397 (1999)
|Abstract||Pylyshyn claims that if a system is cognitively penetrable, its function depends in a semantically coherent way to the organism's goals and beliefs. He rejects evidence of attentional modulation observed in neurons within the visual system, claiming that any modulation seen is not logically related to goals and behavior. I present some of this evidence and claim that it is connected in exactly the way Pylyshyn requires and thus it refutes his main thesis.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joel Norman (2001). Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):73-96.
John K. Tsotsos (1997). Limited Capacity of Any Realizable Perceptual System Is a Sufficient Reason for Attentive Behavior. Consciousness and Cognition 6 (2-3):429-436.
Bruce Bridgeman (2000). Neuroanatomy and Function in Two Visual Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):535-536.
Kevin MacDonald & David Geary (2000). G and Darwinian Algorithms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):685-686.
Jean Bullier (1999). Visual Perception is Too Fast to Be Impenetrable to Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):370-370.
Jeffrey S. Bowers (1999). The Visual Categories for Letters and Words Reside Outside Any Informationally Encapsulated Perceptual System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):368-369.
L. M. Vaina (1990). What and Where in the Human Visual System: Two Hierarchies of Visual Modules. Synthese 83 (1):49-91.
Christopher Mole (2009). Illusions, Demonstratives and the Zombie Action Hypothesis. Mind 118 (472):995-1011.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #291,125 of 722,708 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,708 )
How can I increase my downloads?