The justification of concepts in Carnap's aufbau
Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689 (2003)
| Abstract | This paper concerns the recent debate on the nature and motivations of the epistemological project advanced in Rudolf Carnap's (18911970) Aufbau. Much of this debate has been initiated by Michael Friedman and Alan Richardson who argue (against the received view of the Aufbau as a foundationalist defense of empiricism) that Carnap's epistemological project is located in the tradition of neo-Kantian epistemology. On this revisionist reading of the Aufbau, Carnap's project is not motivated to address traditional empiricist problems regarding the justification of knowledge, but rather to show how objective knowledge is possible. A central aspect of the Aufbau that is neglected in the revisionists' analysis is the role of epistemic justification in Carnap's project. The aim of the present study is to argue that although the general epistemology in the Aufbau can be cast as neo-Kantian, Carnap's method of construction theory (or rational reconstruction) is formulated precisely as an empiricist method for the justification of conceptual knowledge. Construction theory radically redefines `empirical justification' into a formal-conventional notion, and is part of Carnap's more general agenda of redefining epistemology as a purely formal discipline. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Chris Pincock (2009). Carnap's Logical Structure of the World. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):951-961.
Alan W. Richardson (1998). Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
Mehdi Nasrin (2004). Anomalous Monism in Carnap's Aufbau. Erkenntnis 60 (3):283-293.
Thomas Mormann (2006). Between Heidelberg and Marburg: On the Aufbau’s Neokantian Origins and the AP/CP-Divide. Sapere Aude! 1:22 - 50.
Alan Richardson (1990). How Not to Russell Carnap's Aufbau. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:3 - 14.
Richard Creath (1982). Was Carnap a Complete Verificationist in the Aufbau? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:384 - 393.
Christopher Pincock (2002). Russell's Influence on Carnap's Aufbau. Synthese 131 (1):1 - 37.
Christopher Pincock (2005). A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads38 ( #30,893 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |

