A Reply to Laura Purdy

Hypatia 1 (1):175 - 178 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay is a response to the comments and critique of Laura Purdy to my earlier paper "Re-Fusing Nature/Nurture" (1983, 621-632). In it I re-emphasize that the traditional nature/nurture dichotomy is based upon an unacceptable ontology and briefly note the type of metaphysic that would serve as a more appropriate basis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A response to Dodds and Jones.Laura M. Purdy - 1989 - Bioethics 3 (1):40–44.
Moral Status. [REVIEW]Laura Purdy - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (4):569-571.
Reason or Faith?Laura M. Purdy - 1989 - Teaching Philosophy 12 (1):39-41.
At the Crossroads. [REVIEW]Laura Purdy - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (2):303-318.
Xenotransplantation.Laura Purdy & Ololade Olakanmi - 2006 - Philosophy Now 55 (2):9-13.
Are pregnant women fetal containers?Laura M. Purdy - 1990 - Bioethics 4 (4):273–291.
Why do we need affirmative action?Laura M. Purdy - 1994 - Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (1):133-143.
The morality of new reproductive technologies.Laura M. Purdy - 1987 - Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (1):38-48.
Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. [REVIEW]Laura Purdy - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (4):681-687.
In defense of hiring apparently less qualified women.Laura M. Purdy - 1984 - Journal of Social Philosophy 15 (2):26-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
89 (#187,426)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Tuana
Pennsylvania State University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Re-fusing nature/nurture.Nancy Tuana - 1983 - Women's Studies International Forum 6 (6):621–632.

Add more references