David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 11 (2):194-211 (1993)
This essay examines the response of Habermas and Giddens to postmodern criticisms of modernity. Although Giddens and Habermas recognize that the "totalizing critique" of poststructuralism lacks a convincing analysis of social interaction, neither of their perspectives adequately addresses the postmodern themes of aesthetics, play, and cultural memory. Giddens and Habermas believe that these dimensions of social life are important; yet they remain underdeveloped in their approaches. This essay explores the theoretical consequences of aesthetics, play, and cultural traditions for social theory, drawing on the pragmatists, the psychoanalyst Winnicott, and early critical theory. The aesthetic and playful moments of experience must be recast in terms of social theory to avoid the solipsism so often characteristic of postmodernism. The essay ends by suggesting how the theories of Habermas and Giddens could benefit by a closer consideration of these issues
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joe Harkin (1998). In Defence of the Modernist Project in Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (4):428 - 439.
Christopher G. A. Bryant (1992). Sociology Without Philosophy? The Case of Giddens's Structuration Theory. Sociological Theory 10 (2):137-149.
Jeff Livesay (1985). Normative Grounding and Praxis: Habermas, Giddens, and a Contradiction Within Critical Theory. Sociological Theory 3 (2):66-76.
James Gordon Finlayson (2005). Habermas: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Nick Hostettler (2007). Did Ludwig Wittgenstein Really_ Understand Roy Bhaskar? Review of _Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar by Nigel Pleasants. [REVIEW] Journal of Critical Realism 3 (1).
Anthony King (2000). The Accidental Derogation of the Lay Actor: A Critique of Giddens's Concept of Structure. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):362-383.
Steven Groarke (2004). Autonomy and Tradition: A Critique of the Sociological and Philosophical Foundations of Giddens's Utopian Realism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):34-51.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #74,723 of 1,101,096 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,910 of 1,101,096 )
How can I increase my downloads?